The library staff and I have been getting quite a few questions about what the new budget bill will mean for the Chippewa Falls Public Library. I have been trying to wait a while so that no one could accuse me of being unduly alarmist, but when I was asked this past Saturday by a local gentleman if the budget meant the library's membership in MORE was going to be cut, I told him I doubted it but that everything, frankly, was on the table if things got tight enough.
His advice was to make sure the public was warned and informed so that they weren't caught off guard by any changes.
So, I'll try to answer a few of those Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) here:
If Passed, What Does the New Budget Have in Store For Wisconsin’s Public Libraries?
Not much is known just yet. The budget bill recommends the elimination of maintenance of effort funding requirements for belonging to a library system and a 10% cut to the budget of the Department of Public Instruction, the state agency that oversees public libraries and Badgerlink. The budget bill calls for a 10% cut to Badgerlink as well.
What does “Maintenance of Effort” mean?
Maintenance of effort has been a legal requirement for libraries that belong to a library system. The Chippewa Falls Public Library, for instance, belongs to the Indianhead Federated Library System, which administers MORE. The requirement states that a municipality must fund a library at a level that is at least the average of the past three years.
Theoretically, this keeps libraries from being unduly targeted for cuts during sudden power shifts in local government or economic downturns and ensures that libraries in a consortium all contribute a fair share without relying too much on other communities.
So far, Act 150 requirements have been left intact. Act 150 requires that counties pay municipalities for the library service rendered to those living in areas without libraries at about 70% of the actual value of the transactions. In other words, Act 150 requires that Chippewa County reimburse the City of Chippewa Falls (or Bloomer or Cadott) 70% of what it costs the city to provide library service to someone living somewhere like Jim Falls or Eagle Point.
What Could Cuts Mean For The Chippewa Falls Public Library?
The City of Chippewa Falls values its library and knows library service needs to be maintained. However, if the new budget entails large cuts to municipal aid, then the entire city government will need to spend that much less. Changes to services could be possible, depending on the changes in the budget.
No matter what, we will do our very best to avoid any inconvenient changes to or interruptions in service.
How Much Money Does it Take to Run the Chippewa Falls Public Library?
The library budget for 2011 is just over $1 million. Of that, salaries and benefits make up about 74% of the expenditures. The rest is operational, including purchase of books, CDs, magazine subscriptions, databases, MORE membership, utility bills and building upkeep.
Who Oversees the Library?
The library's daily operation is overseen by me, the library director. As a department of the City of Chippewa Falls, the library has a Board of Trustees made up of seven people appointed by the Mayor. The board oversees and has final say over the usage of the budget and monitors the administrative competence of the director.
Because the library receives a sizable amount its budget from the County of Chippewa, we also have two board members from adjacent communities in the County nominated by the County Board Chairperson who report, as needed, to the County Board.
What Can I Do to Speak Up For My Library?
Communicate with government. Let your state legislators and local representatives at the county and city level know that you care about your library, use it and want it to be a funding priority, even in a lean year.
Showing posts with label library budgets. Show all posts
Showing posts with label library budgets. Show all posts
Wednesday, March 16, 2011
Monday, February 28, 2011
Action Alert! Email Harper Collins!
Take note. Rarely will you have such a chance to so DIRECTLY impact your public library's daily operations as you will with the information I am about to give you. And kudos to Children's Librarian Colleen Crowley for the heads-up.
Here's what going on: Harper Collins has just changed its policy regarding the EBooks that libraries have access to through download services like OverDrive. We in Wisconsin get access to OverDrive as part of the Wisconsin Public Library Consortium. Up to now, libraries bought de facto "eternal rights" to EBooks and patrons could download them an unlimited number of times. Harper Collins has now arranged things so that libraries & consortia will have to re-purchase the rights after the books are downloaded 26 times.
When the books are owned as part of a consortium, as ours are, even more difficulties arise from such tallying. If the books are held in common by the libraries of an entire state and the patrons of only one library download a book the aforementioned 26 times, do all the rest of them then miss out? Harper Collins says not to worry about it, because they'll figure out how to handle it. They'll just plant a cookie or tracker of some kind in individual libraries' circulation modules, maybe. After 26 checkouts, POOF! Shell out another $25.00 per library. Or per user. Or something. Nobody is quite sure yet.
This thinking shows that the publisher has no conception of how complicated a library consortium's circulation procedures are. Maybe I'm just not tech-savvy enough to see a cost-effective, customer-friendly solution, but this might just put libraries out of the EBook business altogether.
Joe Atzberger, library geek out of Columbus, Ohio explains it better than I do here:
New OverDrive DRM terms: "This message will self-destruct"
Now, I don't own an EBook reader or iPad or any of that stuff. I was actually thinking of buying a few for the library when this came down. Those who do own these things--and Christmas 2010 was the first really big year for these technologies--will find their local libraries less relevant than they were just two weeks ago because of these changes. As a consumer, the timing strikes me as cynical: squeeze libraries out of the equation after so many people have bought these devices to make sure they have to purchase content on top of the initial platform investment. Not to mention the fact that many libraries are already having serious budget issues.
As a librarian, it further frustrates me because libraries will end up taking the public relations fall. Downloading EBooks is already a complicated affair; now librarians will have to explain that a patron can't get Band of Brothers because 26 people have already read it. I can imagine the puzzled looks now.
If you own a device with which you might download and read Ebooks, Email Harper Collins and let them know that you, as a Wisconsin library user, disapprove of their tactics and timing. Tell a friend, too.
Here's what going on: Harper Collins has just changed its policy regarding the EBooks that libraries have access to through download services like OverDrive. We in Wisconsin get access to OverDrive as part of the Wisconsin Public Library Consortium. Up to now, libraries bought de facto "eternal rights" to EBooks and patrons could download them an unlimited number of times. Harper Collins has now arranged things so that libraries & consortia will have to re-purchase the rights after the books are downloaded 26 times.
When the books are owned as part of a consortium, as ours are, even more difficulties arise from such tallying. If the books are held in common by the libraries of an entire state and the patrons of only one library download a book the aforementioned 26 times, do all the rest of them then miss out? Harper Collins says not to worry about it, because they'll figure out how to handle it. They'll just plant a cookie or tracker of some kind in individual libraries' circulation modules, maybe. After 26 checkouts, POOF! Shell out another $25.00 per library. Or per user. Or something. Nobody is quite sure yet.
This thinking shows that the publisher has no conception of how complicated a library consortium's circulation procedures are. Maybe I'm just not tech-savvy enough to see a cost-effective, customer-friendly solution, but this might just put libraries out of the EBook business altogether.
Joe Atzberger, library geek out of Columbus, Ohio explains it better than I do here:
New OverDrive DRM terms: "This message will self-destruct"
Now, I don't own an EBook reader or iPad or any of that stuff. I was actually thinking of buying a few for the library when this came down. Those who do own these things--and Christmas 2010 was the first really big year for these technologies--will find their local libraries less relevant than they were just two weeks ago because of these changes. As a consumer, the timing strikes me as cynical: squeeze libraries out of the equation after so many people have bought these devices to make sure they have to purchase content on top of the initial platform investment. Not to mention the fact that many libraries are already having serious budget issues.
As a librarian, it further frustrates me because libraries will end up taking the public relations fall. Downloading EBooks is already a complicated affair; now librarians will have to explain that a patron can't get Band of Brothers because 26 people have already read it. I can imagine the puzzled looks now.
If you own a device with which you might download and read Ebooks, Email Harper Collins and let them know that you, as a Wisconsin library user, disapprove of their tactics and timing. Tell a friend, too.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
